From: Andrew Tettenborn <a.m.tettenborn@swansea.ac.uk>
To: Wright, Richard <rwright@kentlaw.iit.edu>
Peter Radan <peter.radan@mq.edu.au>
Date: 23/09/2020 08:36:10
Subject: Re: [Ext] Trespass to Person Case

Didn't it turn mostly on statutory interpretation?

Andrew


On 22/09/20 23:56, Wright, Richard wrote:
Wow! What a novel and very interesting claim! I look forward to many valuable and interesting comments from the relevant side of the Atlantic, and also some from my own side of the Atlantic, while waiting cowardly in reserve to comment on all posts.

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 5:40 PM Peter Radan <peter.radan@mq.edu.au> wrote:
Colleagues,
I am not a torts lawyer, but the opening paragraphs of Pile v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police [2020] EWHC 2472 (QB), caught my attention: 

"1. Cheryl Pile brings this appeal to establish the liberty of inebriated English subjects to be allowed to lie undisturbed overnight in their own vomit soaked clothing. Of course, such a right, although perhaps of dubious practical utility, will generally extend to all adults of sound mind who are intoxicated at home. Ms Pile, however, was not at home. She was at a police station in Liverpool having been arrested for the offence of being drunk and disorderly. She had emptied the contents of her stomach all over herself and was too insensible with drink to have much idea of either where she was or what she was doing there. Rather than leave the vulnerable claimant to marinade overnight in her own bodily fluids, four female police officers removed her outer clothing and provided her with a clean dry outfit to wear. The claimant was so drunk that she later had no recollection of these events.

2. It is against this colourful background that she brought a claim against the police in trespass to the person and assault alleging that they should have left her squalidly and unhygienically soaking in vomit. Fortunately, because this appeal will be dismissed, the challenge of assessing damages for this lost opportunity will remain unmet."

Am I wrong to think that Cheryl was a little hard done by on her trespass to person claim?

Peter

Professor Peter Radan,

Honorary Professor, Macquarie University

Fellow of the Australian Academy of Law

BA, LLB, PhD (Syd), Dip Ed (Syd CAE)


Macquarie Law School  

6 First Walk,  

Macquarie University, NSW, 2109

Australia

Email: peter.radan@mq.edu.au


Blog: https://www.allaboutnothing.info


--
br>
--








Andrew Tettenborn
Professor of Commercial Law, Swansea University

Institute for International Shipping and Trade Law
School of Law, University of Swansea
Richard Price Building
Singleton Park
SWANSEA SA2 8PP
Phone 01792-602724 / (int) +44-1792-602724
Cellphone 07472-708527 / (int) +44-7472-708527
Fax 01792-295855 / (int) +44-1792-295855



Andrew Tettenborn
Athro yn y Gyfraith Fasnachol, Prifysgol Abertawe

Sefydliad y Gyfraith Llongau a Masnach Ryngwladol
Ysgol y Gyfraith, Prifysgol Abertawe
Adeilad Richard Price
Parc Singleton
ABERTAWE SA2 8PP
Ffôn 01792-602724 / (rhyngwladol) +44-1792-602724
Ffôn symudol 07472-708527 / (rhyngwladol) +44-7472-708527
Ffacs 01792-295855 / (rhyngwladol) +44-1792-295855




ISTL

See us on Twitter: @swansea_dst
Read the IISTL Blog: iistl.wordpress.com
My publications can be found here and here and here
Member of the Heterodox Academy and member and adviser of the Free Speech Union



Disclaimer: This email (including any attachments) is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential information and/or copyright material. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email and all copies from your system. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or other form of unauthorized dissemination of the contents is expressly prohibited.